dreamer_easy (
dreamer_easy) wrote2008-01-14 08:47 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Weight Watchers is upset that people are starting to think fatness is normal and acceptable and that women are giving up on dieting. My question is: what's WW's long-term success rate? ETA: after five years, about 16%, at best.
In the meantime, the AMA is pushing for stomach stapling for thousands of teens as young as fourteen. I am suspicious.
In the meantime, the AMA is pushing for stomach stapling for thousands of teens as young as fourteen. I am suspicious.
no subject
no subject
Love your icon.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Shapely Prose
If you haven't discovered Kate Harding yet.
Re: Shapely Prose
no subject
no subject
no subject
I wonder if the AMA is just forgetting that second part of option B.
no subject
For what it's worth, my own experience with WW has been mostly positive (the negatives are predominantly down to me being slightly irritated by the trainer - a personality thing, it's her voice). Having said that, I've lost bugger all weight, but again, that's because I don't get off my arse and do it.
The stomach stapling I'm in two minds about - I can see that it could be advantageous for a small subset, but I do worry about the medicalisation of weight loss overall for the rest of us.
Re: Shapely Prose
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/
no subject
no subject
My main view on it is... I don't want to be rake thin. I do, however want to be comfortable in my own skin. And thats down to me not down to some mediatastic pressures. A lot of the good and the bad in WW appears to come down to regions (as apparently the UK is run a bit differently from the US, I don't know for other areas of the world...) and the person you have leading a meeting. I'm currently going it alone, sans meeting therefore the only person I have to blame is myself.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
OR NOT
no subject