dreamer_easy (
dreamer_easy) wrote2008-11-08 07:00 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Lots of refugee news lately, of which more shortly, but first I wanted to quote you a para from the latest Refugee Council of Australia newsletter:
Statistics fail to justify media obsession with boat arrivals
It was ironic that, while representatives of UNHCR, governments and NGOs were at the UNHCR ExCom meeting discussing the forced displacement of millions of people, the Australian media were giving great prominence to the recent arrival in Australian waters of two boatloads carrying 31 asylum seekers. By any measure, the number of people of arriving in Australia by boat to seek asylum is tiny. UNHCR reports that, at the end of 2007, there were 739,986 asylum seekers around the world with claims still pending. Australia had just 1516 people in this category (0.2% of the global total). During 2007, 468,597 asylum seekers were granted refugee status. Of these people, 1702 (or 0.4%) were granted protection in Australia. Of the relatively small numbers of people who seek asylum in Australia, the great majority arrive by air, generally with a valid short-term visa of some description, and have their protection visa application assessed with no public fanfare. Asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by boat currently make up fewer than 0.01% of the world's asylum seekers.
no subject
Thanks for posting what the officials actually say about it. It's what I love about the net - while there is a lot of tosh out there, there's also a lot of sense! Thank you for being one of the beacons of sense (if sense can be a beacon...)
no subject
I suppose after sixteen years of this bullshit it's not surprising that the press go OMG BOAT PEEPUL scrutinise scrutinise. Just have to hope that this humanises the new arrivals, rather than feeding into needless panic about how we'll all be murdered in our beds, etc.