(no subject)

[dreamer_easy]

Browsing through Enterprising Women over on Google Books, I found some evidence to back up one of my hunches: that a lot of fangirls are mutants like me. The author, Camille Bacon-Smith, recounts how many female fans have experienced "scorn" for their "masculine" interests. She describes Star Trek fangirls growing up during a time when, as teenagers, they were expected to give up any tomboy inclinations, and defer to and flatter boys. "Many women in fandom, however, did not make this transition". Some were outcasts because of their physical appearance; some refused to mask their intelligence. Even in fandom, some suffered ostracisation or harassment from male fans. (That said, as a teenager, I was far more bullied by girls than by boys.) It's possible this explains some of the sensitivity around issues of gender and inclusion into which I have poked my thumb.

Some data points on the gender makeup of fandom. Firstly, from Enterprising Women: in 1988, an index of 34,000 Star Trek fanzines included only 4 edited by men, and only 10% of contributors were male. Polls of readers of sexually explicit Trek zines found they were mostly women. Secondly, this list of 80s/90s fanzines gives a snapshot of offline Doctor Who fandom in the UK: there are women editing and writing, but they're a tiny minority.

Comments

[alawston.livejournal.com]

It's a distinct possibility - the Birmingham Science-Fiction Society, which I never joined but sort of orbited, had a distinct generation divide between the younger members who liked to read but were predominantly interested in Star Trek, Doctor Who, etc, and the elder statesmen who were centred around Roj Peyton and his magnificent bookshop Andromeda (sadly no more). They were pretty scathing about TV in general, apart from the single episode of Star Trek written by Harlaan Ellison, that kind of thing.