dreamer_easy (
dreamer_easy) wrote2004-10-19 06:33 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
More BSG (no spoilers)
That's Archie?! omfg, it is too!
Is it just me, or does Madam President look a little like Monica Lewinsky?
Meant to grumble at the Trek cliche of alienated son and father. Dad (typically dead, missing, or alienated) is always the most crucial thing in everyone's lives in TNG. (Unless you're Geordi.)
Is it just me, or does Madam President look a little like Monica Lewinsky?
Meant to grumble at the Trek cliche of alienated son and father. Dad (typically dead, missing, or alienated) is always the most crucial thing in everyone's lives in TNG. (Unless you're Geordi.)
no subject
no subject
And yes it's Archie, with the stupidest accent ever! Ahem.
no subject
Or just alien.
no subject
While it was indeed beaten to death in TNG et al, I'd be a lot more dismissive of it if it weren't for the fact that not two blocks from my house is a billboard reading "R U MY DADDY?" with a number to call for DNA testing to determine paternity of a child. So, you know, it's not exactly without merit
(Not to mention, living with a 13 year old who's never known his father kinda makes you see things a little differently where that's concerned too)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ah, OK, I take your point on this then. And I did admit that yes, use of parents (and offspring) as plot devices was well well worn on TREK...
no subject
no subject
no subject
Or, more accurately in most cases, by Baby Mamas who want to nail the Baby Daddy for child support (and 90% of the time, rightly so)
But really, there was more a general point there about sons (and daughters) growing up alienated, apart, and otherwise without their fathers, which there's an awful lot of in today's culture. Which is why I don't think it's actually as much a cliche as we'd like to think.