Date: 2008-12-04 10:55 pm (UTC)
My understanding was that "sex" referred to biology, while "gender" referred to identity/social construct. So with that premise, transgender individuals don't go to the initial point, but intersexed individuals do.

I am aware of non-surgery gender reassignments, but not of any non-surgical sexual reassignments.

From a storytelling standpoint, I find the idea of someone reincarnating as someone of the opposite sex far less weird than the idea of somone reincarnating at all - once I've bought the latter, the former is along for the ride.

However, there are a couple of flawed analogies: "race" as a concept, is an attempt to apply a taxonomy to the normal human genetic variation. As far as I can tell, there is not a single case where it has proven to be a useful taxonomy (certainly it has less descriptive power than, say, ethnicity, or class does), but I may be wrong. Scientific evidence cannot "mean an end to Creationism" for the same reason that chocolate cannot mean an end to concrete - they are qualitatively different concepts with qualitatively different assumptions and referents. Expecting such is striving after the wind.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 06:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios