As threatened promised, here's the first part of my summary of the essay 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent, from the talk.origins archive. Note that the author and the archive don't know I'm doing this. My summary's open to correction - please comment!
Firstly, some points from the Introduction:
- Macroevolution means the appearance of new species (and larger groups, such as families and classes). ("Microevolution" is changes within species.)
- Universal common descent is the idea that all organisms (plants, animals, people, etc) are related to each other; that they all ultimately descend from a common ancestor - one original species.
- How life got started in the first place, abiogenesis, is a separate question to macroevolution and common descent and isn't addressed in the essay.
There's a good explanation of the scientific method in the essay, under the heading "What is Meant by 'Scientific Evidence' for Common Descent?". Briefly, a scientist comes up with a hypothesis - in everyday language, a theory. That hypothesis is then tested against the evidence, and discarded if it's shown to be wrong. So the hypothesis has to be able to make a prediction - if it's true, then we should see such and such evidence - and it has to be falsifiable - if it's false, we should see so and so evidence.
Universal common descent is accepted as a fact by scientists because:
- So many predictions from this hypothesis have been found to be true
- No significant evidence that it's wrong has been found
- Large amounts of evidence show that other explanations are wrong
- Many other explanations can't be tested at all.
That's my summary of the Introduction. Next up: phylogenetics, or family trees of living things!
Firstly, some points from the Introduction:
- Macroevolution means the appearance of new species (and larger groups, such as families and classes). ("Microevolution" is changes within species.)
- Universal common descent is the idea that all organisms (plants, animals, people, etc) are related to each other; that they all ultimately descend from a common ancestor - one original species.
- How life got started in the first place, abiogenesis, is a separate question to macroevolution and common descent and isn't addressed in the essay.
There's a good explanation of the scientific method in the essay, under the heading "What is Meant by 'Scientific Evidence' for Common Descent?". Briefly, a scientist comes up with a hypothesis - in everyday language, a theory. That hypothesis is then tested against the evidence, and discarded if it's shown to be wrong. So the hypothesis has to be able to make a prediction - if it's true, then we should see such and such evidence - and it has to be falsifiable - if it's false, we should see so and so evidence.
Universal common descent is accepted as a fact by scientists because:
- So many predictions from this hypothesis have been found to be true
- No significant evidence that it's wrong has been found
- Large amounts of evidence show that other explanations are wrong
- Many other explanations can't be tested at all.
That's my summary of the Introduction. Next up: phylogenetics, or family trees of living things!