Human error is in the assumption, not in the fact.
Complete lack of any provable evidence of any religion's basic premises about the intangible invalidates them as logical or rational constucts.
Which says nothing about the nature or existance of god, merely that any religion that claims to have those answers is illogical and irrational in its claims.
And is thus a product of human error.
So a more acurate statement would be:
"Any religion that claims to have an accurate picture of God is a product of human error."
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 02:37 pm (UTC)Complete lack of any provable evidence of any religion's basic premises about the intangible invalidates them as logical or rational constucts.
Which says nothing about the nature or existance of god, merely that any religion that claims to have those answers is illogical and irrational in its claims.
And is thus a product of human error.
So a more acurate statement would be:
"Any religion that claims to have an accurate picture of God is a product of human error."