(no subject)
Sep. 27th, 2005 05:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Continuing my earlier question about why God would send angels rather than putting in a personal appearance: in Exodus 30 God informs Moses that "Thou canst not see my face: for man shall not see me, and live." Putting aside that they are conversing "face to face" (the rest of the chapter makes it clear that Moses cannot literally see God's face), this confirms the face-melting suspicion, but doesn't answer why God sends a messenger rather than just turning up in a hat two sizes too large.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 08:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 08:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 08:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 12:03 pm (UTC)Most christian interpretations hold that they were actually created before us (kind of necessarily, if one considers the other Christian doctrine (I dunno if it's also a Jewish doctrine... could someone enlighten me on that?) that (a) the serpent in Genesis 2-3 is Satan; (b) Satan is a fallen angel (usually assumed to be the guy formerly know as Lucifer), and that the serpent has clearly been around long enough to know more about life than Adam and Eve did.
N.B. It's not actually necessary to believe in a literal Adam and Eve to grok the intent of the story, but it makes discussing it a lot simpler. =:o} The upshot is that the earliest humans to "qualify" as human (perhaps the first to have evolved or be specially given a "spiritual capacity"...?) encounter somebody who (a) could communicate with them, (b) knew more than they did, (c) had the capacity for deliberate deception, and used it. The latter two points suggest someone/thing that had been around longer than those first humans, or at least had reached maturity before they did.
So one might just as well ask, "why did bother to create humans when he already had angels who could swarm all over the planet, build unsafe nuclear power stations, devastate vast areas of the planet in their efforts to duff each other up and generally be a pain in the divine bum."
I think he just likes having company. It's worth putting up with a few billion rowdy neighbours just to be able to have the odd repentant and resurrected-as-flame-proof sinner around for pizza and a movie, and a fascinating discussion about how having previously been a sinner gives one a whole different perspective on what it means to be holy.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 12:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 07:54 pm (UTC)So one reason why (perhaps) angels are so confusing is because they're something of a theological mismatch. Another question you could ask is: Why did the Jews decide to incorporate Babylonian demi-gods into their theology?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 12:11 pm (UTC)I don't think there's an answer within theology per se. I think the answer is more in the social structures at the time supported by theology.
Man forms kingdom-type social structures.
Man is formed in God's image.
Therefore, Man's kingdom-type social structures are also in God's image.
Therefore, Heaven is a Kingdom.
If Heaven is a Kingdom,
God is the King.
Kings have flunkies, including heralds.
Therefore, because God is a King, God must also have flunkies, including heralds.
Basically, God would not deliver messages Himself because it's simply "not done", at that time in history, by a king directly.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: