(no subject)
Sep. 28th, 2005 09:45 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Some thought-provoking news items on religion:
Societies worse off 'when they have God on their side'
Gakked from
nostalgia_lj: Do Unnatural Acts Cause Natural Disasters?
In brief: higher rates of religious belief coincide with higher rates of social ills such as murder and STDS; no correlation between numbers of gay citizens and natural disasters.
I sometimes worry what would happen if the Pagans were put in charge. Would we, too, turn to dogma, greed, and power-grabbing? Or would we simply be unable to form a stable government?
Societies worse off 'when they have God on their side'
Gakked from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
In brief: higher rates of religious belief coincide with higher rates of social ills such as murder and STDS; no correlation between numbers of gay citizens and natural disasters.
I sometimes worry what would happen if the Pagans were put in charge. Would we, too, turn to dogma, greed, and power-grabbing? Or would we simply be unable to form a stable government?
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 12:01 am (UTC)I suspect so. People are people.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 12:16 am (UTC)I think if we want a huge society, we have to accept limits and structures and strictures and such. But, likewise, we can't have a huge society if those strictures are too limiting, or too exclusionary.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 12:21 am (UTC)How are we defining religiousness? Are we talking about specific religions, or specific groups of religions, or including spirituality? Does belief in evolution negate religiousness, as they seem to be implying in the article? Is there any attention paid to how this religiousness is expressed? (In other words, if you mean conservative Christianity, say conservative Christianity, don't say "religious belief" in general.)
Bloody buggering hell, I am getting sick of the implication that religion is necessarily bad for you.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 02:22 am (UTC)An interesting aside -- "Japan, Scandinavia, and France are the most secular nations in the west" -- quoted verbatim from the article. Since when is Japan in the west, never mind the West?
There's a rather ethnocentric primacy placed on belief in science.
I'm not saying that I don't think that evangelical Christian ideas don't contribute to, say, teen pregnancy rates and abortion rates and STD rates in the US -- I'm sure they do. But there's a level of generalization going on here that I'm not sure is valid.
(Full disclosure: I'm an anthropology student, and I tend to think that statistics are nonsense...)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 05:48 am (UTC)Praise God-damned "Bob"!
i realised very quickly that the counterculture can be just as dogmatic and inflexible as the straights. Gary Clail was right.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 06:04 am (UTC)Howls of derisive laughter, Bruce!
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 08:33 am (UTC)I think it's fair to mention Darwin, whose ideas exploded the logical necessity for a Creator, the backlash against which produced Creationism and similar conservativism. What's misleading and foolish is to create an imaginary split between religion on the one hand, and Darwin on the other, since MOST MAJOR FAITHS ACCEPT EVOLUTION.
It's a shame the article's so shabby; at least it admits it's not a "definitive" study, but is only trying to start discussion. With Christian extremists in the US actually blaming natural disasters and terrorism on gays, etc, it's an issue worth examining.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 08:46 am (UTC)You nailed it.
The emperor/researcher has no clothes. I shake my head in desair and move along...
no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 09:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-28 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 06:56 am (UTC)