dreamer_easy: (doctor who mickey says oy)
[personal profile] dreamer_easy
More from George Orwell, who can feel one of his moods coming on:

"In addition to this there is the horrible - the really disquieting - prevalence of cranks wherever Socialists are gathered together. One sometimes gets the impression that the mere words 'Socialism' and 'Communism' draw towards them with magnetic force every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, sex-maniac, Quaker, 'Nature Cure' quack, pacifist and feminist in England."

[on vegetarianism] "... the food-crank is by definition a person willing to cut himself off from human society in hopes of adding five years onto the life of his carcase; that is, a person out of touch with common humanity."

These are from The Road to Wigan Pier. My gods, what would he have made of me!

Orwell doesn't explain what he finds objectionable about feminism (or sandals, for that matter), although I have seen him go into detail elsewhere about his issues with pacifism. I'd be quite interested to know if it was simply prejudice, or had some basis in the real world. I'm also curious about what the vegetarian movement was like at the time. I personally gave up meat for ethical reasons, and it was many years before I found out this was also good for my health.

Date: 2007-03-08 01:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endis-ni.livejournal.com
Hmm. It makes me want to develop the theory of "the museli-knitter umbrella". Clearly, George Orwell has no problem shoving a very diverse group of people under this rather expansive umbrella of "huh, nutjob probably knits their own museli into the bargain. Not like the sensible majority of humanity."

Now, the thing is, I'm sure I've got an umbrella like this, I'm sure a lot of people have. For example, I'm pleased to get the majority of my vegetables from the local organic box scheme, but would shake my head and tut at those denouncing leather shoes.

Different situations call for different furling of people's personal umbrellas, of course, but if someone's ever gone "Um, yeah, right on, but get a grip!" then chances are, they have a museli-knitter umbrella too. It's unlikely to be as huge as George Orwell's, and might cover a very different group of people, but the principle's the same.

Anyway, that's the theory I'm currently going with.

Date: 2007-03-08 01:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Ah! This is Orwell's equivalent of "latte sipping chardonnay swilling" etc etc. How hilarious!

Date: 2007-03-08 01:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redstarrobot.livejournal.com
I'm also curious about what the vegetarian movement was like at the time.

Hitler was known for being a vegetarian in the 1930s and 1940s, which probably didn't do wonders for its PR. The other famous vegetarian of the time was Kellogg, who was marketing his cereals to do things like lessen masturbation and so on, so there was an element of the snake oil cure to it. Many advocates of vegetarianism were members of Christian sects or Eastern-influenced fringe groups (like Mazdaznan, and, in the Christian vein, Kellogg again). So at the time, it probably had a reputation of being a common symptom of some sort of slightly wacky zealotry and snake oil salesmen/cult leaders, rather than a strictly food-related choice.

Date: 2007-03-08 01:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
The thing he says about cutting yourself off from the rest of humanity is interesting. I've had that experience, only in reverse - when I wasn't able to eat dairy at all, and was therefore effectively vegan whether I liked it or not, a large number of restaurant menus indicated that I simply didn't exist.

Date: 2007-03-08 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redstarrobot.livejournal.com
I have the same issue with wheat and trying to eat out. (This one place near my evening classes, the only thing I could eat was the french fries, since all the salads were pre-croutoned... and it turns out I can't even eat the fries, because the seasoning isn't gluten-free.) It is a being-cut-off in a sense, literally not being able to break bread with other people.

Date: 2007-03-08 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Celiac. The reason I ought not to have complained about asking for pizza without cheese and getting cheese. "Could I please have a pizza without the pizza?" Argh!

Date: 2007-03-08 01:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redstarrobot.livejournal.com
On the plus side, it would have made us a very efficient team. You could get the crust, and I could get the cheese.

Date: 2007-03-08 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jvowles.livejournal.com
Kate, I love ya to death, but I don't always know what to make of you. :)

It's not vegeterianism that is objectionable, it's the attitude of certain vegetarians. It's not feminism that's objectionable, it's the attitude of certain....well, you get the idea. Substitute Christianity, paganism, fandom, etc. as you wish.

It's not the idea, usually, but those who espouse it in really annoying and/or problematic ways.

I've always known you as a *rational* proponent of the things you believe in -- you made your choices both from the heart and from the head, and you're willing to accept that being a vegetarian means fewer choices when going out to eat. As with most pagans I know, you are willing to discuss your faith but unwilling to force it down others' throats.

You share without evangelizing, and you wish to discuss without blaming.

Sadly, I have met obnoxious proponents of other "fringe" beliefs. Attend a protest in DC sometime to see what I mean -- many of the folks who show up for those give the protests a bad name, and ordinary folks a reason to poo-poo and marginalize the rational folks in the movement.

Imagine if the only contact people had with Doctor Who was via the RADW crew right around the time you left.

Perhaps that's what's happening here?

Date: 2007-03-08 03:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Interestingly, Orwell argues at length that Socialism is avoided by potential converts partly because they see Socialists as a bunch of irksome freakazoids. He admits it's unreasonable to judge an idea by an annoying individual - but perhaps he's doing exactly the same thing! Which would a shame, because his criticism of pacificism was clear and intelligent; if he had a legitimate beef with the sandal-wearing weirdoes, I'd be keen to read it.

Date: 2007-03-08 03:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jblum.livejournal.com
It's not vegeterianism that is objectionable, it's the attitude of certain vegetarians. It's not feminism that's objectionable, it's the attitude of certain....well, you get the idea.

...This would be a good response, except that Mr. Orwell's comment refers to "every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, etc etc pacifist and feminist in England." You're discriminating between good and bad ones in those groups; he explicitly isn't!

Date: 2007-03-08 05:33 pm (UTC)
off_coloratura: (pissed tink)
From: [personal profile] off_coloratura
"...every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, sex-maniac, Quaker..."

Hey!

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 12:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios