(no subject)
Mar. 27th, 2007 09:25 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It seems increasingly likely that the US has little or no case against David Hicks and is desperate to cover its national ass through any means necessary. Wholly innocent people have ended up in Guantanamo Bay by mistake. I have no idea whether Hicks has committed crimes... and I suspect the US has no idea either.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 12:17 am (UTC)I think it's likely that much of Guantanamo is wholly innocent; offering bounties for nameless criminals turned in on someone's say-so is a witch hunt, not a legal action. Given the methods of capture, the methods of interrogation, and the methods of trial, all seriously flawed, it's unlikely we'll ever know whether anyone at Guantanamo has committed crimes - even if they really have.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 01:08 am (UTC)Which speaks volumes for the quality of 'evidence' they must have.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 12:22 pm (UTC)double-fucking-standards, this entire administration...