dreamer_easy: (pomona)
[personal profile] dreamer_easy
Via [livejournal.com profile] threerings: Pastafarianism has its first martyr! Way to go, guys!

More seriously: you should read [livejournal.com profile] rainbowjehan's short, moving account of Maundy Thursday.

Still on religion... there's a bit of interest in some sort of Doctor Who Pagan Witchy Mythology comm, but I don't think there's really enough for me to go ahead and litter LJ with yet another tiny, seldom-used community. (Although if anyone disagrees and wants to start one regardless, please go ahead!)

Date: 2007-04-12 05:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mondyboy.livejournal.com
I should say that I'm not labelling Mike Tucker as an anti-semite. He probably wasn't aware of the iconography either, or, for that matter, Steve Cole the editor or anyone else at the BBC.

It's probably why I mostly kept my mouth shut at the time.

Date: 2007-04-12 05:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Similarly, I don't think Gareth or Russell were deliberately being misogynist; just reproducing an old bit of misogyny.

Date: 2007-04-12 05:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mondyboy.livejournal.com
And I think that's where you differ from Lawrence Miles (assuming you read his recent rant) inasmuch that he seems to believe there is a genuine level of intent involved. He argues that it might be a gay thing - which I also thought was a bit on the nose.

Date: 2007-04-12 06:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alawston.livejournal.com
Oh brilliant, is Larry off again? He's becoming as much a part of Doctor Who tradition as Christmas specials and not-quite-kisses!

Date: 2007-04-12 06:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mondyboy.livejournal.com
Yes, he went off. Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on how you look at these things) he took his posting down from his blog after 24 hours.

It wasn't as bad as his Unquiet Dead rant. Not even close. The problem with Larry is how he obscures his own arguments by mentioning that:
(a) he's a social inadequate;
(b) if you met him you probably wouldn't like him; and
(c) he's not a bi-sexual but he's sucked cock (which is not a direct quote but reasonably close).

So there you go.

Date: 2007-04-12 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alawston.livejournal.com
a) Painfully obvious, sadly. I was once sitting next to him in Camden for a mutual friend's birthday drinks for about three hours, and didn't get much more than 'All right?'
b) He's never had much to say to me, but I think that's more in his own head. I think pointlessly angry people are kind of fun.
c) Well... I've known plenty of guys who apparently ARE bi-sexual but have never sucked cock, so I guess it's fine that it cuts both ways...

Date: 2007-04-12 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
I missed the rant. If only someone would email me a copy!

Date: 2007-04-12 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alawston.livejournal.com
Please forward that to me if you do get a copy!

Date: 2007-04-12 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] infinitarian.livejournal.com
Google "lawrence miles" beasthouse "shakespeare code", and read the cached version.

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 03:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios