Will the real Mr Saxon please stand up
Jun. 9th, 2007 06:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So far, fans have theorised that Mr Saxon, John Simms' character in the Doctor Who series finale, is the Master, the Monk, the Doctor, the Valeyard, the Doctor's brother, the Doctor's son, Dalek Caan, Timothy Latimer, the head of Torchwood Glasgow, and various combinations of these characters.
Amidst this madness, many fans have suggested that perhaps he's just an evil politician, and the Toclafane and/or Saxon's "right hand woman", Miss Dexter, are the real baddies. I'm really surprised by the level of excitement over the possible return of the Master, though. I'd trust RTD to work wonders with the worn old excuse for a villain, but what is it that people see in the character?
Personally, I agree with the fans who reckon Saxon will turn out to be Adam from Dalek (aka Davros).
Amidst this madness, many fans have suggested that perhaps he's just an evil politician, and the Toclafane and/or Saxon's "right hand woman", Miss Dexter, are the real baddies. I'm really surprised by the level of excitement over the possible return of the Master, though. I'd trust RTD to work wonders with the worn old excuse for a villain, but what is it that people see in the character?
Personally, I agree with the fans who reckon Saxon will turn out to be Adam from Dalek (aka Davros).
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 08:58 am (UTC)Well, he's got that whole equal-and-opposite-of-the-hero thing going on. And then there's the fact that they knew each other at school, which appeals to the sort of people who want to know more about the Doctor's past. And they can have a proper snarky relationship in a way that you can't get with catchphrase-reciting monsters like the Daleks and the Cybermen. (Not that the Master doesn't have his catchphrases, but they're not all of his vocabulary.)
Also: slashiness. Everyone seems convinced that Tennant and Simm are going to have Chemistry.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 09:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 09:17 am (UTC)you mean shippiness? ;)
I really hope John Simm will not turn out the be the Master. I never liked him as a character, nor as a plot device: someone might be holding the threads in the background, Doctor investigates, the Master is identified and a few seconds later defeated. Just let Saxon be a politician who got more than he bargained for, or any other Time Lord who played with his chameleon arch quiet a while ago, but not the Master.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 09:01 am (UTC)I'm writing that fic right now.no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:12 am (UTC)I totally want to read that fic right now.no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 11:48 am (UTC)There are so many directions you could take that character post-Time War. And he'd be so much more emotionally resonant than he used to be. The Doctor used to be distraught and damaged because he was the only Time Lord left. Now he's not, but the only other survivor is a homicidal prick that he might have to kill.
Completely honest: if Saxon does not wind up being the Master I am going to be so disappointed I'm likely to shout at the television. If he's got anything to do with the Daleks I am also probably going to shout at the television.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 12:49 pm (UTC)I'll be a bit disappointed, but as long as he's something interesting I'll be okay. My fantasy of Jack Davenport as the Master will be dashed either way. *g*
If he's got anything to do with the Daleks I am also probably going to shout at the television.
Oh, yes. At the top of my classically-trained lungs. It won't be pretty.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 02:13 am (UTC)LOL!
I, too, will be annoyed if they resurrect the Daleks ONE MORE TIME without giving us at least 90% of a season without them. They have become such a one-note villian, and now we've gotten ourselves (again) into the "one-Time-Lord, one-Dalek" schtick, which we played so much better the first time, when we actually thought it was true.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 12:47 pm (UTC)Honestly? I have no idea. I freely admit it makes no rational sense. But I adore him anyway. Both incarnations.
If I try to make rational sense of it, I get about as far as (a) I identified with Nyssa liek woah, (b) Ainley did his job and then some in making Tremas a solid and very likable character of his own when he could have been a mere walking plot device, and (c) the resulting creepitude of the body-snatching spilled over into the not-always-as-effective later characterization of the Master.
But when all is said and done, I've just always thought he was great fun. And in my head, if there's only one other Time Lord who survived, it has to be him. For reasons that skip right over the Moriarty conceptual origin and straight into "Because he's a cockroach."
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 02:12 pm (UTC)I think the appeal is for all of the reasons he's a cliche -- if the Master didn't exist, they would have to create him. I don't think it's a coincidence that both the Meddling Monk and the War Chief have been assumed by some to be the same character -- because they really all fit the same whole in the mythology, which is the dark reflection of the central character.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:26 am (UTC)And right now, there's so much interesting drama they can pull out of his character. There's the obvious irony in the one other remaining Time Lord in the universe being the Doctor's archenemy. And then there's the basics that the old series never did much with. They were friends once upon a time when they were in school, and now are/were bitter enemies - which presents a lot of room for bitterness and regret and so on.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 05:44 pm (UTC)