(no subject)
Sep. 6th, 2007 10:39 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As part of a goal of converting 10% of Sydney to Christianity by 2012, the Anglican Archbishop of Sydney is proposing spending half a million dollars on distributing the Gospel of Luke to every family in the city.
I have two questions about this plan: firstly, is this actually an effective way to gain converts, or is it spam? Secondly, what could, say, Anglicare do with half a million bucks?
(Dr Jensen has a point about most people not having read the Bible since childhood - I remember a prepubescent effort of mine to read the entire Good News New Testament, which floundered somewhere in the Acts. I'm curious about why Luke seems to be the gospel of choice for evangelism, so I must have a re-read of it.)
I have two questions about this plan: firstly, is this actually an effective way to gain converts, or is it spam? Secondly, what could, say, Anglicare do with half a million bucks?
(Dr Jensen has a point about most people not having read the Bible since childhood - I remember a prepubescent effort of mine to read the entire Good News New Testament, which floundered somewhere in the Acts. I'm curious about why Luke seems to be the gospel of choice for evangelism, so I must have a re-read of it.)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 12:54 am (UTC)The New Testament has better dialog, but gets too preachy for my tastes.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 12:55 am (UTC)Personnally, I think this money could be better used. It's not going to work on me.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 12:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 01:02 am (UTC)Uh, I instinctively type Doctor with a capital. That's telling!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 01:17 am (UTC)You'll know these bibles - you'll see them at Op Shops with the Ken Done style cover.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 01:21 am (UTC)and yeah...less spam, more feeding people pls, archb.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 02:11 am (UTC)love
Catherine - lapsed confirmed anglican, among other things
no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 02:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:following on from last post
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 03:46 am (UTC)O_O
From:Re: O_O
From:Re: O_O
From:Re: O_O
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 04:21 am (UTC)I'm not a fan of Dr Jensen and I'm relieved to not be in his archdiocese.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-06 11:26 am (UTC)It could very easily be both. It's definitely spam, but all the dreary Media Buyers I talk to at work (when I'm not on LJ) keep telling me direct marketing is the most effective form of advertising.
Luke the Evangelist
Date: 2007-09-07 12:54 am (UTC)Anyway, even if Luke is the most effective evangelist of the four, I still don't think this is the best use of marketing dollars. Strangely, I (an ordained minister with an undergraduate degree in public relations) am not often involved in deciding what *would* be the best use of church marketing dollars. I guess I'm out of the loop.