Further to my previous
Mar. 4th, 2008 07:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Now, if y'all will follow the link like I told you, you can see some of the actual survey questions people are being asked about evolution and creation, with confusing results. Have a look - how would you answer? Could you answer? (I couldn't.)
ETA: Have a quick read of Wikipedia on theistic evolution, which IMHO is a likely explanation for those confusing survey results.
ETA: Have a quick read of Wikipedia on theistic evolution, which IMHO is a likely explanation for those confusing survey results.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-04 03:28 pm (UTC)Creationism, and in fact most biblical literalism, seems at it heart counter to the explicit instructions we're given in those documents.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-04 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-04 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-04 09:55 pm (UTC)Agnostics are far too reasonable for chat shows etc and so get no publicity. "I've written a book called, erm, God May Or May Not Be Great". :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 11:13 am (UTC)Check it, yo: We really have only two explanations for the existence of complexity on the scale of intelligent life (which is pretty breathtakingly complex). One of them is deliberate creation by other intelligent life. The other is evolution through natural selection. No other solution is really logically tenable, so far as we are aware.
So even if humans were actually designed by God, God itself would need to be either designed by some kind of uberGod or be a being evolved through natural selection. Neither of these options is particularly satisfying, suggesting as they do either an infinite recursive pyramid of creator deities (turtles all the way down) or that God is actually just a really powerful alien of some kind.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 11:54 am (UTC)