(no subject)
Sep. 3rd, 2008 12:36 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I thought I'd cheer myself up by watching The Making of Me avec la Barrowman. There's lots of lols, but I defy you to watch the bit with Pete, who was subjected to the whole Clockwork Orange bit in an effort to torture teh ghey out of him, and not want to have a little cry. JB is appalled to learn that homosexuality was only decriminalised in Scotland in 1980. He wonders if, had he grown up there instead of Illinois (the first US state to drop its sodomy laws, in 1961), he might have been one of the many gay kids who take their own lives.
To balance that a bit, here are some cute dogs.
ETA: That reminds me -
murasaki_1966 pointed me to a New Scientist news item: Bisexuality passed on by 'hyper-heterosexuals'. "How can there be 'gay genes' given that gay sex doesn't lead to procreation? The answer is remarkably simple: the same gene that causes men to like men also causes women to like men, and as a result to have more children." Interesting... now do the same experiment with lesbians!
To balance that a bit, here are some cute dogs.
ETA: That reminds me -
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 02:57 am (UTC)So... is it entertaining and informative?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:51 am (UTC)on a lighter note, though, john and scott's old married couple bitchery is worth the whole damn show. ♥ '...what, you think i read it? what?'
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:26 am (UTC)Having said that K9 Tales came in stores today. *Soo much choice*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:02 pm (UTC)(The Virgin America ones are, if anything, funnier still.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:49 am (UTC)*headdesk*
there's no point in arguing with closeminded stupid people shouting from behind a Bible :(
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:19 am (UTC)she ought to learn not to argue with a pregnant woman!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 11:39 am (UTC)I think it serves to highlight the danger of this fixation on the hunt for a 'gay gene': it's just sending the world back to this ridiculous mentality of 'either/or', when it has always seemed more likely to me that the answer will turn out to be 'both'.
On a related note, a good friend of mine posted to his LJ not long ago posing what I thought was a very important question: in terms of equality, why does it matter whether same-sex attraction is down to nature or nurture (or even a conscious choice)? Isn't it important to fight for acceptance regardless? I understand that a definitive genetic 'answer' would allow same-sex attracted Christians to say "God made me this way," but I don't think that the end-goal should be an answer which shuts up the Christian Right (although that would be lovely). If a genetic predisposition to same-sex attraction becomes identifiable without the underlying bigotry being addressed, surely they'll just shift their focus from 'we can make you straight' to 'excellent, we can ensure that you aren't even born'. *shudder*
They gay rights lobby, in Britain at least, is immovable from its stance of 'being gay is not a choice'; however, I know a handful of gay/bi people who say that, for them, they were aware of elements of choice. The idea of sexuality as a spectrum goes some way to making sense of this: depending on to what extent you are same-sex attracted, and how acceptable it is in your own society, you can choose to act on it or not. I probably include myself in this category - I seem to be predominantly attracted to the opposite sex, and I live in a country where I have been able to be open about my same-sex attraction in relative safety, so I have been able to choose to explore that. If I lived in Saudi Arabia, I would probably have kept that side repressed.
Sorry for the rambling comment as usual. Take it as a compliment: you get me thinking. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 06:47 pm (UTC)Only by shifting their position on abortion. That would be a fun discussion in the Phelps Mansion - which is the greater evil, homosexuality or terminating a pregnancy?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 06:15 pm (UTC)http://www.equalitygiving.org/Sarah-Palin-on-the-issues-Equality-Quotes-Gay-Rights
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 10:39 pm (UTC)Last week I heard an interesting show on Radio 4 by a great journalist called Jon Ronson. He was talking to a chap from Los Angeles who became a born-again Christian, but lost his faith when the Catholic child abuse scandal broke; he said he saw too much evidence of the church covering it up. The final nail in the coffin of his faith was when he learned that many priests known to be abusers were seemingly shipped up to Alaska, where they perpetuated horrendous abuse of eskimo children on a huge scale - when the victims came forward they were offered $10,000 each by the church to keep quiet.
That's all I can think about now when I hear the words 'Christian' and 'Alaska'.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:31 am (UTC)Me neither - I think the focus will just shift from "you can choose to be heterosexual" to "you can choose not to have homosexual sex." For them it will always be about "choice" of some description. I've had people argue that it's no different to choosing not to act on sexual attraction to children - personally I think the argument would just shift further in that direction than it already is (at least here. *sigh*)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 10:46 pm (UTC)I think you're completely right though - for some gay people their sexuality is defined in terms of 'otherness', and don't like it when pesky halfgays come along and prove that actually there isn't a gaping vaccuum between them and the hetties.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:05 pm (UTC)There might be a gay gene. Abnormal levels of testosterone in the womb might affect a child's sexuality in later life. A mother's immune response to carrying a male child might have a similar impact on later males foetuses. Matt Ridley, in his excellent book "Genome", mentions apart from rare cases, that no one thing has overall control of how a human body develops. Genes are expressed as a result of other genes, or hormonal shifts, and hormonal shifts can be brought about by genetic expression or environmental factors, and how we respond behaviourally to the environment can affect which genes get activated and our hormone levels. (Sadly, it was too long ago that I read the book to find the chapter. I remember that he likened trying to control a human body to trying to control an economy, though.)
So Mr Barrowman decided that he must be gay because he wasn't the first male foetus incubated by his mother? All well and good, except that I am an only child, and several of my partners have been either only children or sole or first-born sons. Where does that leave us? Faking it?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 09:43 pm (UTC)Depressingly, that's the way they do *all* documemtaries over here now. Not just the "there must be one answer", but also the "I must travel from place to place, finding a new clue in each location taht eads me to the next place... (that I already had the flights booked to by the production asistant because she'd read the synopsis we worked up three months in advance of how we were going to structure the documentary). Oh, plus the "I must waste two minutes of screen time out of every five staring out of car/plane/train/apartment/office windows, so that my narrator can helpfully repeat everything we've covered thus far for the benefit of anyone with the attenstion span of a heavily concused goldfish (or who is trying to watch the show on an American commercial TV station, and has forgotten where we were sometime during the six week long ad break).
Even bloody *gardening* shows are doing it now! =:o{
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 11:09 pm (UTC)bitchguinea pigamusingly clueless celebrity presenter. :)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 09:16 am (UTC)