Geography quiz!
Jan. 15th, 2009 03:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I received this JPG in email:

Eighteen nations are named on the map. How many are "Arab lands"?
Only nine of the eighteen countries named are Arab nations: Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Sudan, and Yemen. None of the others identify themselves as Arab nations, belong to the Arab League, or have a majority Arab population.

Eighteen nations are named on the map. How many are "Arab lands"?
Only nine of the eighteen countries named are Arab nations: Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Sudan, and Yemen. None of the others identify themselves as Arab nations, belong to the Arab League, or have a majority Arab population.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 06:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 06:39 am (UTC)Incidentally, this reminds of something I learned recently: Turkey was the only country in an international survey where a higher percentage of the population rejected evolution than in the United States. This fact helped explain why the only person to ever tell me Darwin was evil was Turkish.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 06:43 am (UTC)What a turkey.I left out Sudan, but left in Tunisia even though it's not on the map, so in fact, the total should be nine. Geography I can manage, with the help of Wikipedia and the CIA Factbook. Maths, not so much. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 08:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 10:36 pm (UTC)Sudan would have to be a bit 50:50 though to be a member of the Arab nations though surely - according to this site it's only 39% Arab, although it is 70% Muslim.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 10:20 am (UTC)You'd have thought someone with a genuine interest in "ending unjust Jewish occupation" would generally *know* that Pakistan is not an Arab country...
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 11:06 am (UTC)A better caption, in my view, would be "Count the nations with democratically elected governments." Not quite as striking a contrast as it would have been in 2002, but reason perhaps for optimism.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 11:45 am (UTC)Hmmm. How do we meaningfully compare countries? By area, population, arable land, GDP? The US isn't on that map, yet it occupies one country and is a close ally of another: how does this affect the map's meaning?
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 01:02 pm (UTC)ISTR that Hamas was democratically elected in Gaza. Which rather upset the U.S. administration, which had long been trumpeting the benefits of democractic elections (never mind their own electoral...irregularities).
Compounding the Muslim == Arab fallacy, there's the "democratic election == good, humanitarian leadership and/or U.S. ally" fallacy.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 06:25 pm (UTC)It's like if China occupied Sydney, and sarcastically said to 4 million refugees "OH BOO HOO HOO! THERE'S STILL PLENTY OF AUSTRALIA, YA CRYBABIES!" Never mind that the various forms of Arabic are near-to mutually unintelligble.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 08:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 08:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 08:50 am (UTC)