dreamer_easy: (SCIENCE)
[personal profile] dreamer_easy
Can you skate faster in lower gravity?

Date: 2009-08-10 11:54 pm (UTC)
elsaf: (Default)
From: [personal profile] elsaf
No, you can't. You could sled faster because less weight would mean less friction against the ground. But skating all but removes the friction element and your speed would be determined by air resistance and momentum, which is determined by mass -- which doesn't change in lower gravity.

Date: 2009-08-11 08:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jblum.livejournal.com
Ah! So -- could you skate faster in a vacuum?...

Date: 2009-08-11 11:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kelemvor.livejournal.com
For as long as you could hold your breath...

Date: 2009-08-11 12:03 pm (UTC)
elsaf: (Default)
From: [personal profile] elsaf
I think you could, but I'm not certain. I have forwarded this question to my brother the mechanical engineer for an authoritative answer.

Date: 2009-08-11 01:15 pm (UTC)
elsaf: (Default)
From: [personal profile] elsaf
My brother says, yes, you could skate faster in a vacuum because that would remove the air resistance.

He also offered that in low-gravity, the air would be less dense (if you weren't in a pressurized environment), so you might have a little less air resistance. However, this would be balanced by a reduction in the force you could exert to push yourself forward, because the friction between the wheels and the ground would be less.

Date: 2009-08-11 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pbristow.livejournal.com
"the wheels and the ground"

Ah! Are we talking roller skating or ice skating? I was assuming the latter 'til now.

Date: 2009-08-11 12:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] browneyedgirl65.livejournal.com
I'd doubt that you'd skate faster, unless there was less air friction to slow your mass down.

But you'd probably hit every triple or quadruple axel you tried :)

Let's find out!

Date: 2009-08-11 01:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lynsaurus.livejournal.com
If you find a way to test this personally, I'd love to join you in the interest of science.

Re: Let's find out!

Date: 2009-08-11 04:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lynsaurus.livejournal.com
Yay! First, we need low-gravity water skis so that I can get over there.

Re: Let's find out!

Date: 2009-08-11 09:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jblum.livejournal.com
If we lower the gravity enough, maybe you could *jump* over here.

(*calculates* a sub-orbital hop would take a while, though.)

Date: 2009-08-11 08:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeriendhal.livejournal.com
You'd probably have to skate slower (at least at first) because ground/wheel coefficient would be lower, allowing less control, and it would be much harder to slow down once your mass gained momentum. But as others have mentioned, your stunts could be frigging spectacular.

Date: 2009-08-11 10:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hiraethin.livejournal.com
I would have thought that maximum possible velocity would be higher. Assuming resistance due to air remains the same, there would still be lower friction between the skates and the surface. OTOH you actually use that friction to accelerate, so you'd take longer to reach top speed.

Some sort of thruster would be useful.

Date: 2009-08-11 02:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pbristow.livejournal.com
As others have noted, vis-a-vis the physics, probably not. As far as the human element goes: I think you'd have to skate more *carfeully*/delicately in lower gravity, and thus would probably go slower until you'd got plenty of practice. On the upside, if you get it wrong: Less painful boo-boos. =:o}

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 01:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios