CALL FOR PAPERS: "SHE'S A SHE"
Jun. 21st, 2005 09:06 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Now that the entire new series of Doctor Who has screened in the UK, I'm sending out a call for papers for "SHE'S A SHE": THE FEMALE RESPONSE, a fanzine of female fans' reactions to the new show. Articles for the zine should be 500 to 2000 words in length, should not be reviews, and must be written by a girl or woman. Please leave a comment / email me to suggest your topic first so I can coordinate everyone's stuff. Artwork also needed! I'll need all content by the end of September 2005, with the aim of making the thing available by the end of October. The zine will be distributed in PDF format, with a nominal donation to Amnesty International asked in return for the download.
ETA much later: Alas, the zine isn't going ahead.
ETA much later: Alas, the zine isn't going ahead.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 12:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:04 pm (UTC)You mean you are *wrongly* equipped to be participating in a femzine. There's nothing "lesser" about a vagina.
[BRISTOW SMILES SMUGLY AND HOPES THIS BLATANT SUCKING-UP TO THE FEMINIST EDITOR WILL QUALIFY HIM TO BE THE ONLY PLONKER-EQUIPPED-PERSON ALLOWED TO CONTRIBUTE.]
=;o>
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:49 pm (UTC)Excuse me for snark, but:
Date: 2005-06-21 03:07 pm (UTC)Not a comment to you, personally, just saying...
Over-equipped? :-)
Date: 2005-06-21 03:48 pm (UTC)Re: Excuse me for snark, but:
Date: 2005-06-21 03:49 pm (UTC)Re: Excuse me for snark, but:
Date: 2005-06-21 03:52 pm (UTC)When I said 'over-equipped' I wasn't think in terms of 'who's best' but more in the physical 'more stuff flapping around' sense.
I do apologise to anyone reading this while they're eating...
Re: Excuse me for snark, but:
Date: 2005-06-21 04:10 pm (UTC)You've been looking at those screen grabs from The Rainbow.
Re: Excuse me for snark, but:
Date: 2005-06-21 07:14 pm (UTC)...
Date: 2005-06-21 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:03 pm (UTC)Maybe something on either: a) the Earth-centric quality of this run, or b) how I, as a fan of the classic series (Shes were shes back then, too), was totally surprised by my level of squee when I'd heard DW was coming back.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:11 pm (UTC)Is anyone writing anything about the 'fangirl' phenomenon in general, as it applies (and always has applied!) to Doctor Who? The fangirls are coming out of the closet for the new series, but they've always been around.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:56 pm (UTC)Okay, so: here we are talking about fangirls who have crushes on Doctors. I'm thinking about something broader, encompassing some of the stuff we talked about in that other thread... the attention to relationships, sexuality, social statements, etc., because those aren't things that fanboys are known for. And fanboys have made up most of DW fandom until now.
It could be 'So You Want to Be a Fangirl': discussion of the ways that girl geeks differ from boy geeks (with disclaimers that none of it is exclusive, of course), and what the female influx means for DW.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-23 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:28 pm (UTC)*ponders* Umm, would it be okay to do something on how the Doctor's gendered in the new series and how that affects me as A Lady?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 06:38 pm (UTC)Umm, I dunno how much I can make that make any sense, but I shall try for you and Amnesty.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-23 08:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 04:30 pm (UTC)Into The Woods: Rose and the Big Bad Wolf
The Red Riding Hood folk tale once warned girls against stepping off the path. Rose, in her red hoodie, not only steps off the path of her mundane life but [...]. This article looks at the symbolism of the RRH myth and how it is used in season 1 of new Who.
(you can see how I so nearly typed 'paper' there, can't you? I was waffling about this last night on JadePagodaTV and worked out an idea of what happens - give me a bit of time rereading my Mariana Warner, Angela Carter etc and it's good to go...)
edited to hide spoiler for TPotW.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-23 03:58 am (UTC)Could you tell me more or less what you want in the way of art? As in, size, DPI, format, subject matter, etc.? Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-23 04:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-23 11:00 am (UTC)Companion Like Me?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-23 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-03 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-03 12:32 am (UTC)