(no subject)
Oct. 14th, 2005 03:13 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
What a silly thing to say: commenting on Homo floriensis, aka the recently discovered fossil "hobbits", anthropologist Desmond Morris reckons that "the existence of Mini-Man should destroy religion". (He's talking about a hypothetical tribe of living "hobbits", but the point's the same with just the fossils.)
Morris has somehow slid from Creationism a few paragraphs previously to all religion; as I noted here recently, most religions accept evolution, so this is just sloppy nonsense. (Numerous comments have been left by Christians who have no trouble reconciling the two.) Moreover, the discovery of other close human relatives such as Neanderthals hasn't given the Creationists the slightest pause, let alone "destroyed religion". Living, thinking, speaking "hobbits" would certainly challenge a number of core religious beliefs, as Morris points out; but Christianity and other religions were not "destroyed" by the enormous impact of science over the last 150 years-ish. And whatever the evidence, Fundamentalists will interpret it as damage and route around it.
Morris has somehow slid from Creationism a few paragraphs previously to all religion; as I noted here recently, most religions accept evolution, so this is just sloppy nonsense. (Numerous comments have been left by Christians who have no trouble reconciling the two.) Moreover, the discovery of other close human relatives such as Neanderthals hasn't given the Creationists the slightest pause, let alone "destroyed religion". Living, thinking, speaking "hobbits" would certainly challenge a number of core religious beliefs, as Morris points out; but Christianity and other religions were not "destroyed" by the enormous impact of science over the last 150 years-ish. And whatever the evidence, Fundamentalists will interpret it as damage and route around it.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 06:40 am (UTC)eg http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/10/more_zany_young.html
But yes, the whole 'religion and evolution are anti-matter' stuff is nuts, and plays into the hands of the fundies.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 07:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 10:38 am (UTC)What's the difference supposed to be?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 11:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 02:39 pm (UTC)Anyways, creationists reject offhand anything that doesn't fit with their worldview. Why would one more hominid ancestor, regardless of age, location, or size, be treated any differently?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 04:12 pm (UTC)