Mark 10:6

Nov. 3rd, 2005 10:47 pm
dreamer_easy: (Genesis)
[personal profile] dreamer_easy
I have a question (for the knowledgeable this time, thank you, rather than for the peanut gallery :-) about this verse:

But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. (KJV)

(Did you see what I did there?)

The context is Jesus' teaching on divorce, but I was wondering if this reference to Genesis is the one [livejournal.com profile] synaesthete7 mentioned a while back, and if so, if it's a paraphrase of Chapter 1. (I'm curious about how Biblical literalists reconcile Chapters 1 and 2 - again, another issue which must have engaged great minds for centuries.)

Date: 2005-11-04 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Clearly the redactors weren't worried about apparent contradictions! But Chapter 1 isn't quite sequential, since there Adam is created last of all the creatures on the sixth day, and in Chapter 2 the animals are created after him - apparently after the seventh day, although I guess the idea is this is a flashback. :-)

I just noticed a rather wonderful thing. In Chapter 1, God has been rather abstractly bringing things into being with words. In Chapter 2, He uses His hands - not just the familiar picture of making Adam from the clay, but he plants the garden of Eden. I have this lovely mental picture of God kneeling and working in the soil. Maybe with a little wheelbarrow by his side, humming "Morning Has Broken".

Morning has broken

Date: 2005-11-04 09:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purplepooka.livejournal.com
Already? What shoddy workmanship....
< g,d&r >

Date: 2005-11-08 02:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rj-anderson.livejournal.com
It depends on which translation you're looking at whether the present or past tense is used in regard to God creating the plants of the field and the animals He brought to Adam to name.

I do think the garden of Eden was planted specifically as an environment for Adam after Adam was created, however -- at least that's how it reads to me, though I could be wrong and it wouldn't break my heart if I were. So your mental image of God humming might not be too far off. :)

Date: 2005-11-08 02:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rj-anderson.livejournal.com
Oh, and also, I think [livejournal.com profile] purplepooka is right, tongue-in-cheek or not: it seems very unlikely to me that a redactor, if such a person had existed, would have failed to smooth over the very first two books of the Bible!

Date: 2005-11-08 07:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
You're right (of course)!

KJV: And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air (Genesis 2:19)

NIV: Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air.

Holman: So the LORD God formed out of the ground each wild animal and each bird of the sky, and brought each to the man to see what he would call it.

New Living Translation: So the LORD God formed from the soil every kind of animal and bird.

Contemporary English Version: So the LORD took some soil and made animals and birds.

Egad, the confusion! I must look into this further.

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 10:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios