dreamer_easy: (science)
[personal profile] dreamer_easy
Last year I found out, while critting someone else's SF, that fusion reactions create radioactive waste. As I was one of those SF readin' teens who grew up thinking of fusion power as the Philosopher's Stone, this was a shock, and I wondered why I hadn't learned it before. (Or was I busy writing fanfic during that lecture in first year chemistry?)

Two letters in the 3 December 2005 New Scientist reminded me of this discovery, but the editor has some reassuring facts: the fusion reactor would only be a tenth as radioactive as spent uranium rods; and the materials would have a much shorter half-life ("The radioactivity of a fusion reactor is predicted to drop by a factor of 10,000 within 100 years, compared to a factor of 5 for a conventional nuclear power plant.")

A more serious problem is that it may be decades before any fusion reactor will be up and running (and I heard on the radio today that it will be a decade before "clean coal" technology is available). We can't afford to wait - clean power is available right now, this house is running on it, and cutting down the amount of power we actually use is often as much a matter of will as of technology.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 05:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios