dreamer_easy: (science)
[personal profile] dreamer_easy
Last year I found out, while critting someone else's SF, that fusion reactions create radioactive waste. As I was one of those SF readin' teens who grew up thinking of fusion power as the Philosopher's Stone, this was a shock, and I wondered why I hadn't learned it before. (Or was I busy writing fanfic during that lecture in first year chemistry?)

Two letters in the 3 December 2005 New Scientist reminded me of this discovery, but the editor has some reassuring facts: the fusion reactor would only be a tenth as radioactive as spent uranium rods; and the materials would have a much shorter half-life ("The radioactivity of a fusion reactor is predicted to drop by a factor of 10,000 within 100 years, compared to a factor of 5 for a conventional nuclear power plant.")

A more serious problem is that it may be decades before any fusion reactor will be up and running (and I heard on the radio today that it will be a decade before "clean coal" technology is available). We can't afford to wait - clean power is available right now, this house is running on it, and cutting down the amount of power we actually use is often as much a matter of will as of technology.

Date: 2006-01-15 05:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephanielake.livejournal.com
What sort of tech is your house running on?

Date: 2006-01-15 05:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
It R teh GreenPower. (Sorry about the netspeak, it's the drugs talking.)

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 09:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios