dreamer_easy: (Default)
Teh Moff feels gingerly around the Doctor's gender the way you might wiggle around a loose tooth you can't quite get to fall out:
"... dozens of other actors [besides Matt Smith] were seen - of many different ages and backgrounds... not all of the actors who went for the role were white... What does Steven make of those who opposed the idea of the Doctor changing skin colour? 'How can you cling to the logic of regeneration when, never mind colour, how does he change height? I mean, between Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy, where did the extra bits go? Are they stored in hyperspace or what?... How does he always have his hair done when he regenerates?... Why has he shaved? How could any of this work? So he could absolutely change colour, yes.' [...] But... what about changing gender? Is that a step too far? 'Well, it could happen one day, and it's an exciting possibility. I would worry that you would no longer believe that it was the same person. Cos that's a big one. If a man changes his shape and appearance, it could believe it's still him... [with regeneration] you're saying, 'this man is definitely the same guy you've been following'... I wonder if making him female might push it? Maybe not. Maybe someone will come along who's more up-to-date and modern than me, and it could work... Given that the science of regeneration is nonsense, I don't think there's any scientific reason he couldn't do it. But it's a problem of narrative... Would you actually think, 'That's still William Hartnell'? ... the Doctor is quite blokey in certain respects. There are certain aspects of him that are quite male - his inability to settle down, his restlessness, his desire to avoid emotion and tinker with his engine - which all feel to me to be quite male. But, someone else may one day come along and say, that's a rule, let's break it. That's great when people do that.'"
On sex in the old and new shows:
'... in Doctor of old, nobody snogs! The Doctor was just one of a range of characters who didn't snog... Sarah Jane never snogged, no-one reacted to it. Neither did the Brigadier!... Actually, now we've gone a lot further to say that he is very reticent in those matters, because we see him faced with those things... old Doctor Who never specifically said that the Doctor avoids such encounters, but modern Doctor Who does.'
Lots more on that subject, but I'm not going to keep quoting, because it wouldn't be fair to DWM. Go and buy 417, it's chocka with terrific interviews, including Matt, Karen, and David, not to mention John Barrowman and Russell Tovey!
dreamer_easy: (SCIENCE BIOLOGY)
I overheard part of a conversation at the con - forgive me, whoever was participating, as I've entirely forgotten! - affirming that although the Doctor could obviously be played by a Black actor, he could never be played by an actress, as this would make no scientific sense. The more I think about this simple remark, the deeper it gets.

Until quite recently, race was considered to be a real, natural category - something obvious and commonsense, decreed by biology or God. For decades, science's self-correcting mechanism has been chipping away at this illusion. We now understand that, biologically, there's no such thing as race - which means it's a cultural idea, something we invented and imposed. The evidence of our own eyes, which once seemed to confirm the illusion, now challenges it, as we encounter more and more people of mixed race. Sadly, the scientific evidence doesn't mean an end to racism, any more than scientific evidence means an end to Creationism; but we can hope to see this imaginary system of categories gradually blur away to nothing.

Physical sex, bodily gender, are another matter. Nature seems to confirm the obvious, solid categories of male and female with every birth: there are plenty of children of mixed race, but there are no children of mixed sex.

Except, obviously, that there are: millions of them. Transgender people, intersex people, people with any of a great many genetic syndromes which complicate our common sense, either/or picture of gender (and who may suffer very much as a result of our insistence on it). This powerfully challenges the idea that, while race is not a natural category, sex is, and it therefore wouldn't make sense for the Doctor to change sexes.

Despite this complexity, though, it's not usual for humans to change sex without medical assistance. (It's not impossible: there's a family in the Dominican Republic where some of the girls become boys at puberty.) Outside the human race, though, there are species across the animal kingdom who naturally change sex - to have as many offspring as possible, or to keep their social hierarchies organised. Some fish do it, some sea cucumbers do it, shrimp, sea snails, bristle worms, frogs... some species change sex just once, some can switch back and forth as necessary.

These natural sex changes are a matter of rebuilding the body, something which is difficult for adult human beings to do without help - but clearly trivial for Time Lords, who do precisely that at every regeneration. (Hmm, I wonder if this is why men and women on Gallifrey wear the same clothes?)

In fine: whatever objections one might have to casting an actress as the Doctor, science doesn't really lend them any support. Without making any judgements on anyone, I think those objections have more to do with our ideas about sex and gender than the concrete, fleshly reality of sex and gender: and I think those ideas are worth examining.

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 02:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios