*scrubs the slow cooker*
Aug. 22nd, 2007 02:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yet another podcast, this time about the personification of evil, in particular, evil spirits:
'...in eastern traditions the ambiguity and ambivalence of these figures is much more accepted. So that if your community were suffering from some type of terrible fever, disease, you would identify the demon of that disease and you would propitiate that demon. And this is why people in the western tradition are so amazed and awed by the religious art of Indonesia and Tibet because it seems to be so frightening and demonic. But this is because spirits of danger become spirits who can get rid of danger.
You don't have that in the western tradition. What happens in Christianity is that spirits of danger become uniformly evil, and they must be exorcised and chased away and bound and sent back to where they came from.'
I don't think that's an east vs west thing - it's a monotheism vs polytheism thing. I immediately thought of the ancient Greeks and the gorgoneions, Gorgon faces, they put on their buildings to ward off the evil eye - using a malign influence against itself, fighting fire with fire. But if you have only one all-powerful, all-good deity, then good can't flow from any other source.
'...in eastern traditions the ambiguity and ambivalence of these figures is much more accepted. So that if your community were suffering from some type of terrible fever, disease, you would identify the demon of that disease and you would propitiate that demon. And this is why people in the western tradition are so amazed and awed by the religious art of Indonesia and Tibet because it seems to be so frightening and demonic. But this is because spirits of danger become spirits who can get rid of danger.
You don't have that in the western tradition. What happens in Christianity is that spirits of danger become uniformly evil, and they must be exorcised and chased away and bound and sent back to where they came from.'
I don't think that's an east vs west thing - it's a monotheism vs polytheism thing. I immediately thought of the ancient Greeks and the gorgoneions, Gorgon faces, they put on their buildings to ward off the evil eye - using a malign influence against itself, fighting fire with fire. But if you have only one all-powerful, all-good deity, then good can't flow from any other source.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 08:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 09:40 am (UTC)You hear of yetzer ha-ra, the evil inclination, as being the root of things like sexual desire - but then again, the yetzer ha-ra is why God described the creation of humanity as "very" good (as opposed to the rest of creation, which was merely good).
ra is clearly an exceedingly negative term: it's hard to find a more negative term without getting really specific - for instance, an "abomination" (toievah is related to specific forbidden practices, such as bestiality).
Mostly, though, I'd describe it as the absolute opposite of tov, "good."
There is a chiasmus in the verse cited between light/dark and peace/evil - so that can either show the relative importance of peace, or perhaps show how evil is the opposite of peace (by "peace," I mean shalom, which is actually more accurately translated "wholeness," "perfection," "completeness," or the like)
The use of "ra" to mean "unlucky" as in ayin ha-ra (generally pronounced by those who would use the phrase ayin hora) is an Eastern European thing - it's closely associated with the folk religion there which was very concerned with evil spirits, &c.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 12:43 am (UTC)That, and drainage. :-)