dreamer_easy: (science)
[personal profile] dreamer_easy
New Scientist is always full of fascination. Just one issue (23 July) is chocka with stuff which I'd like to rave about - trypanosomes' lazy use of a single promoter for hundreds of genes, a possible cure for IBD using nerve stimulation, that Austrian cardinal (and pal of the Pope) who rejected evolution, yet another study showing that the antidepressants keeping me alive don't actually do anything (but also proof that chronic fatigue syndrome isn't imaginary, news which will not stun any of its many sufferers), etc.

Let me instead talk about the Doctor's head.

Firstly, Christopher Eccleston's remarkable noggin, which would be an ideal candidate for ear shape recognition, as described in that overstuffed issue of NS.

Secondly, the characteristic which David Tennant's incoming bonce shares with Paul McGann's ovary-exploding visage: their faces are both asymmetrical. Have a look at the cover of DWM 359: Tennant's eyes don't quite line up. Now, NS is always running articles about some study or other which shows that symmetrical faces are the most attractive. But what if slight asymmetry adds the spice of interest? Or is finding both gentlemen gorgeous merely another sign of my fathomless perversion?

Date: 2005-08-04 01:18 pm (UTC)
ext_1468: (p_ten)
From: [identity profile] grapefruitzzz.livejournal.com
Tennant's face is *very* crooked, so much that it looks like he had an accident at some point. His nose is bent in one direction, and one side of his eye-socket looks slightly sunken. However, I think he's literally entrancing, and much prefer his asymmetric looks to John Barrowman's more normal face. There's not as much there to catch the eye.

Date: 2005-08-04 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amy-chesis.livejournal.com
Woah! I thought I was the only one who had noticed that David Tennant was ever-so-slightly cross-eyed, as exampled on the latest cover on DWM. He's got a beautiful bone structure, though I still much prefer Eccleston's strikingness to Tennant's rather delicate prettiness.

Date: 2005-08-05 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Eccles is terribly handsome. I just seem to have a thing for kawaii!

Date: 2005-08-05 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
KYYYOOOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTT

Date: 2005-08-04 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phlegethon-vii.livejournal.com
Don't ask me, I'd rather shag McCoy :p

Date: 2005-08-04 01:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phlegethon-vii.livejournal.com
In a figurative sense, of course *grin*

Date: 2005-08-05 12:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
I want that on a T-shirt to wear to conventions.

Date: 2005-08-05 01:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phlegethon-vii.livejournal.com
*snarf*...milk and computers don't mix, you evil evil person.

Man imagine, walking up to him with that on a tshirt, lol.

Date: 2005-08-05 01:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phlegethon-vii.livejournal.com
Actually I should make him a tshirt that says: Even lesbians dig me!! I am Teh Sex OMGWTF!!!

Date: 2005-08-05 01:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Even lesbians dig me!!

Yeah, what is it with that? LOL

Date: 2005-08-05 02:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phlegethon-vii.livejournal.com
Maybe its the SSRIs I'm on. Who knew it stood for Swervy Sexuality Randomness Initiaters??

All I know is that my Sylv fixation is pretty random, lol.

Date: 2005-08-05 07:37 am (UTC)
ext_15510: (partners in crime - 7/Ace)
From: [identity profile] whochick.livejournal.com
ROFL ... I'll make you one ...

Date: 2005-08-05 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phlegethon-vii.livejournal.com
LOL, yayness!!

Date: 2005-08-07 12:59 pm (UTC)
pedanther: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pedanther
Tangentially, am I misreading your icon or does it really say "parnters in crime"?

Date: 2005-08-08 05:48 am (UTC)
ext_15510: (shoot myself)
From: [identity profile] whochick.livejournal.com
LOL! OMG! I just realised it's misspelt! ROFL.

You know, I've been using it for weeks and nobody else (myself included) has noticed!

Date: 2005-08-05 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amy-chesis.livejournal.com
I have a t-shirt that reads "I've shagged Celation". I was never brave enough to wear it to a convention.

Date: 2005-08-05 10:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Oh my God, etc!

Date: 2005-08-04 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] severa.livejournal.com
I've always found a guy with slightly odd/off features far more attractive and interesting than the perfectly symmatrical. Symmatry is boring.

Like Jack Davenport's squiffy eye.

And as my brother pointed out once: If symmatry is beauty, than spiders ought to be the most attractive animal on the planet, but they're not.

Date: 2005-08-04 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antikythera.livejournal.com
Not spiders. Sea urchins. ^^

Date: 2005-08-04 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reveilles.livejournal.com
Yes, perfectly symmetrical features are a bit boring, but they also make me suspicious of the too-perfect person. If they're too pretty, they're hiding something. Someone with imperfections is somehow more accessible to me.

Though I've wondered for years how Shannen Doherty managed to become a major actress with a face as asymmetrical as hers. I think the viewing public is more accepting of men with interesting faces than with women with interesting faces.

Date: 2005-08-05 02:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drox.livejournal.com
...spiders ought to be the most attractive animal on the planet, but they're not.

Unless you're another spider. Which is how it should be, I guess.

Date: 2005-08-05 08:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
I was watching a documentary about spiders which included stuff about mating, and I was wondering why they haven't become extinct, because if I was a spider and another spider got on me I'd go "Euw a spider!!!!" and flick it away.

Ear shape recognition?

Date: 2005-08-05 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reynardo.livejournal.com
Something like this?

Image from the journal of [livejournal.com profile] taleya.

Date: 2005-08-05 02:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drox.livejournal.com
...a possible cure for IBD using nerve stimulation...

I take it that's not Infectious Bursal Disease then.

Date: 2005-08-05 08:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateorman.livejournal.com
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's Syndrome and Ulcerative Colitis). Nothing to do with choox. :-)

Date: 2005-08-05 07:47 am (UTC)
ext_15510: (profound)
From: [identity profile] whochick.livejournal.com
Symmetry is over-rated! lol. I just have to look at anyone I've ever crushed on (Paul McGann, Neil Finn, Ralph Fiennes etc) and all of them have endearing little quirks in the scon department.

*runs off and looks at her husband*

Nods.

*runs back, leaving bewildered husband in livingroom*

Yep. The observation holds true across the board.

Date: 2005-08-08 11:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cherrypep.livejournal.com
Findings from several studies show that there is a poor relationship between attractiveness and symmetry in human faces: http://cogprints.org/4349/01/Zaidel2005.pdf

There would appear to be a link between health and symmetry, although also no clear link between attractiveness and health.

Apparently, there's a question as to whether 'beauty' is a cognitive function at all, as such. If not, the chances are that the studies in the NS were just asking the wrong question, in the good old garbage in - garbage out tradition. What's beauty? Might as well ask about art.

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 06:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios