Race and racism anon meme thing
Aug. 5th, 2007 07:31 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
International Blog Against Racism Week begins tomorrow, 6 August. Before the week officially starts, I'd like to try something a bit dodgy.
For the next twenty-four hours, you can leave an anonymous message here with any questions you have about race or racism. IP logging is off and there are no LJ Toys or other IP-capturing stuff to worry about.
I know many people are afraid to say or ask things about these subjects, for fear of looking stupid or causing offence. I'll delete anything that's obviously just supposed to be abusive, and anything that uses insulting words, but otherwise, anything goes. POC, please be warned: that means there may be annoying, frustrating, or offensive material - you may prefer not to read the comments left here.
I can't guarantee answers to questions that are posted, but I will try to respond if I can. I won't judge or lecture anyone for honest curiosity or confusion. (Keep in mind I'm just a well-meaning White middle-class liberal, and no expert on racial issues.)
The twenty-four hours is up, folks! You can still post anonymously, but IP logging is back on. Thanks for your comments!
For the next twenty-four hours, you can leave an anonymous message here with any questions you have about race or racism. IP logging is off and there are no LJ Toys or other IP-capturing stuff to worry about.
I know many people are afraid to say or ask things about these subjects, for fear of looking stupid or causing offence. I'll delete anything that's obviously just supposed to be abusive, and anything that uses insulting words, but otherwise, anything goes. POC, please be warned: that means there may be annoying, frustrating, or offensive material - you may prefer not to read the comments left here.
I can't guarantee answers to questions that are posted, but I will try to respond if I can. I won't judge or lecture anyone for honest curiosity or confusion. (Keep in mind I'm just a well-meaning White middle-class liberal, and no expert on racial issues.)
The twenty-four hours is up, folks! You can still post anonymously, but IP logging is back on. Thanks for your comments!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 10:44 am (UTC)To be blunt: the second half of this sentence comes across as incredibly condescending, in a paternalistic, "I know what's best for you, PoC" sort of way. A better phrasing might be, "POC, please be warned: that means there may be annoying, frustrating, or offensive material - please take this under consideration and make your own decision as to whether or not you would prefer to read the comments left here."
To be even blunter: I think setting yourself up as some sort of information resource about race and racism is a bad idea for a lot of reasons. However, I encourage you to point people to sources where they can do further reading and research, such as the links being collected on the ibarw community.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 05:05 pm (UTC)signed,
The same person.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 11:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Belatedly
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 11:06 am (UTC)(And yes, I'm being serious)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 02:41 am (UTC)I live and lived in an Olympic city...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/olympics2012/story/0,,2100795,00.html
And an APEC city:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200705/s1925224.htm
http://www.greenleft.org.au/2007/715/37140
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 12:18 pm (UTC)It's not something I can control, but I know it's there, and it troubles me.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 01:09 pm (UTC)Is being anonymous on this thread compulsory? I can't be bothered being anonymous.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 02:06 pm (UTC)I suspect that it's worse when X is a majority group, but X could also be an isolated minority and the same thing would probably happen.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 02:14 pm (UTC)Does this not firstly obscure the real problem as people focus on these 'power struggles' and 'false consciousnesses' instead of dealing with actual racist acts and people, and secondly lead to bad results such as identity politics and other 'reactions' that simply serve to encourage those who see others as 'different' based on whatever their idea of 'race' happens to be?
That is, does you explicitly dividing your readership up onto 'POCs' and 'non-POCs' not play into the racists' hands by legitimising the idea of some fundamental, essential difference between the 'POC' and the 'non-POC', when the ideal would be for the C-ness of each person to be irrelevant, and them to be treated exactly the same regardless of perceived 'racial' characteristics?
That is -- by you drawing the distinction, you are accepting that a black person is not the same as a white person, in ways that go beyond phenotype. Is this not exactly the idea that racists use and that we should be combatting, not endorsing implicitly or explicitly?
Should we not instead be trying to treat everybody the same?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 09:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-08-09 11:33 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-08-09 02:11 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 05:10 pm (UTC)These links may also be helpful in answering your question.
http://tep.uoregon.edu/workshops/teachdiversity/idontseecolor/idontseecolor.pdf
http://www.rachelstavern.com/?p=395
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-08-05 06:54 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-08-06 08:38 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 09:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 08:24 am (UTC)http://cluelessch1x0r.livejournal.com/7021.html
http://cluelessch1x0r.livejournal.com/1020.html
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 04:19 pm (UTC)Because here's what's likely to be said in some version or other,(the same thing said to women who question sexism,) "I don't understand why you can't just get over it. You can vote and own property and go to school now. Stop harshing my oblivious mellow as a member of the privileged class/gender."
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 08:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 12:23 am (UTC)Oops.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 12:34 am (UTC)