dreamer_easy: (tardis)
Completely forgot to plug this! The crisply-edited and entertaining Doctor Who podcast Bridging the Rift had me on as a guest. I had an absolute ball, and I loquaced like no one has loquaced before.
dreamer_easy: (hypomanic)
Oh dear, I think I'm hypomanic, and we're watching Warriors Gate. I just delivered a two or three minute largely incoherent speech about randomness. Chaos Theory! Chaos Magic! Quantum forces operating on a macro scale! Altered Walter! Cross Purposes! Donald Duck in Mathemagic Land!

Oh no, Frankalike is back, mewing at the door. In a moment Tim will be enormous.

ETA: To get a sense of my current mental state, go to this page with illustrations of the Egyptian afterlife. If you cannot stop laughing at the pictures, you're where am I now.
dreamer_easy: (TENTH DOCTOR)
Following up the references in Bury, snagged a couple more books on how men and women communicate, and almost immediately discovered my problem and its solution:
"It is also worth noting that aggressively negative questioning often leads people to take up entrenched positions - especially in a public debate - and little cognitive progress is made when this happens. Defensiveness is not an attitude which encourages creative thinking. Supportive elicitations and modified criticisms are much more likely to facilitate good quality open-ended discussion or productive exploratory talk."
- Janet Holmes, Women, Men, and Politeness
Well, dur, you may remark. My problem has been - is - that I sometimes provoke that defensiveness with my bluntness, my "bald disagreement", then get annoyed by all the defensive talk and only become even more blunt. What I have to accept is that, if I want a good discussion, I need to try to avoid provoking defensive responses in the first place, regardless of what I may think of that kind of reaction. (Intriguingly, as ChiTARDIS showed, I'm seldom so blunt in face-to-face communication - not only is this a "male" way of speaking, it's also an Internet way of speaking, terse and to the point. Or, to put it another way: tl;dr.)

More on this shortly.
dreamer_easy: (post-food coma)
Ask me about any of my icons and/or interests and receive an explanatory burble forthwith.
dreamer_easy: (facepalm)
I need to change how I handle misreadings of my occasional controversial statements. It's not realistic to expect every online visitor to read carefully; such is the nature of the net. Strawmen - clumsy or deliberate misreadings - are a huge red button for me; the injustice of being accused of saying something I didn't galls me. But if my goal is to communicate, then I can't just grumpily insist people read what I actually wrote and avoid jumping to conclusions; I'll have to be prepared to patiently explain myself. (Mind you, I did have one visitor who was concocting amazing lies; there's no point in trying to explain anything to someone like that.)

ETA: And an opportunity to try this approach appears almost at once...
dreamer_easy: (IT STINKS)
1. The term "political correctness".
2. The abusive terms "white trash", "trailer trash", "redneck", "hillbilly", "chav".
3. The lie "I'm sorry, but..."
4. All variations on the abusive term "retard".

Will add more as I think of them. "Let this be a warning - to you!" - Crow T. Robot

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

Expand All Cut TagsCollapse All Cut Tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 11:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios