dreamer_easy: (moon)
Hatred in the Hallways: HRW responds to the bullying of gay American kids. Links to their 2001 report and suicide prevention resources.

One of the things that's struck me while doing my homework on Islam is its non-hierarchical structure, compared to more familiar religions such as the Catholic and Anglican churches. Rather than pronouncements handed down from the top which everyone's supposed to go along with, you can go to any alim or Islamic scholar and ask for a ruling. I think this one reason Westerners get confused; we expect a single "Islamic" view, and instead discover a plethora of denominations, schools, and individuals, all opining away. (That's what a fatwa is - the opinion of a religious scholar, nothing more.)

Now I don't want to overstate this comparison, as there are very profound differences, but my own religion of Neo-Paganism is also largely non-hierarchical. This was brought home to me when I tried to find out whether I could, tongue-in-cheek, call myself a mushrika. Google promptly produced several different definitions of the term and who it could be applied to. (It's clear I'm going to have to hit the books some more over this one!) There's a saying: "twelve witches, thirteen opinions", and I think the same may be true for the ulema. :)

This brings me back to Ms Moon:
"The same with other points of Islam that I find appalling (especially as a free woman) and totally against those basic principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution...I feel that I personally (and many others) lean over backwards to put up with these things, to let Muslims believe stuff that unfits them for citizenship, on the grounds of their personal freedom."
Again, it's hard to know exactly what Ms Moon has in mind here. But this idea that Islam is ultimately incompatible with freedom, especially for women, is paralleled in some Pagan thought, particularly in the Goddess movement. Some feminists are working hard to reform traditional religions such as Christianity and Judaism. Other have given up on the Abrahamic faiths as being inevitably, hopelessly oppressive, particularly for women, and have turned to Paganism as an alternative. (And quite a few people fall somewhere between the two camps.)

I thought of this when reading a Pagan response to the dreadful tragedy of gay kids taking their own lives, which several recent well-publicised examples have suddenly brought into the spotlight. That response draws in turn on a Baptist minister's call for theological change from an unspoken model where "God is at the top, (white, heterosexual) men come soon after and all those less valued by the culture (women, children, LGBT people, the poor, racial minorities, etc.) fall somewhere down below."

It's tempting to satirise some of Ms Moon's points by showing how well they apply to Christianity, her own religion, just as well as they do to Islam - to say, with some Pagans, that Christianity is incompatible with freedom, especially for women. Personally, though, I haven't given up on the Abrahamic faiths; even a glance at their histories shows how capable of innovation they are. Besides, they're not going away any time soon.

But I do want to say, with Jason at the Wild Hunt blog, that "... it is more important than ever for us to make it known that our alternatives exist. To be visible and to make common cause with those who are told to hate themselves by the dominant faith lens."

I can't speak for every Neo-Pagan or Wiccan; no-one can. I can tell you, though, that the goddess I worship, Inanna, is the patron of all sexuality. In the Mesopotamian hymns and tales she's a macho warrior and a new bride. Her clergy (as best we can tell) included gay men and cross-dressers. As the evening star, she's compared with a sex worker, hanging out of the tavern window looking for business! She's not a mother goddess; she's a goddess of sex, and without her, nobody can bothered with it. Starhawk says that the lovers taken from us by AIDS are her martyrs. She's the reason I've blogged so much about sex education, reproductive freedom, and freedom from sexual violence. If you are a slut, a fag, a queer, a whore, a tranny, a monogamous heterosexual, or a hopeful virgin, this goddess, who was worshipped for thousands of years and who has burst back to life, wants to gather you up in her huge multicoloured bouquet of life and love and joy. (Heck, if you're celibate or asexual, jump on in. It's a big bouquet.)

Jason blogs: "My 'something else' is the modern Pagan movement, but it isn't the only 'something else' out there." Hold on. Don't give in. You're part of nature too, and God loves you. You will find friends and a safe place to be yourself. Reach out for help. Don't give in. Hold on.
dreamer_easy: (DEBUNKING)
You may have heard about the Tunisian pilot who stopped to pray instead of following emergency procedures, leading to a crash and sixteen deaths. Only thing is, he prayed while following emergency procedures. The International Federation of Airline Pilot's Associations describes the crew responding in "textbook fashion and completing a successful ditch at sea." Here's a transcript from the leaked cockpit recording. As you'll read, the pilot's frantic efforts to save the plane are interspersed with exclamations like "In the name of God, most compassionate, most merciful". Bet you a buck that if he'd said "Jesus Christ!" or "Oh my God!" (or indeed, "That's all guys! Fuck!") the headlines would be different.
dreamer_easy: (BLUE ROSE)
Past time I did an update on Gaza. The fact is, I've bookmarked dozens of links - about the damage done in the recent conflict, the recent Israeli election, etc. Rather than spend all day spamming you with links, what I'd like to do here is focus on the issue that involved me in the first place: war crimes and violations of human rights before, during, and after Operation Cast Lead.

In recent days, Israeli newspapers have published the testimony of IDF soldiers of the wanton killing of non-combatants and other abuses. The UN has also reported evidence of the killing of civilians and their use of human shields, and Physicians for Human Rights Israel has called for an investigation into attacks on medics and denial of emergency medical care during the conflict.

I often see claims that international human rights groups criticise Israel while ignoring abuses by Palestinians. These claims are, well, lies. Amnesty International wants all participants held accountable, as do Human Rights Watch.

All of this is placing pressure on Israel to investigate the behaviour of its troops and officers. Israeli human rights group Yesh Din notes that the soldiers' testimonies were made public, no investigations had been started.

An editorial comment. I'm still new to this issue, but to me, the conflict seems to be powerfully fuelled by an attitude of "We're not talking to you, you're beyond the pale". Parties on all sides uninterested in ending the killing misuse the moral high ground as an excuse to dodge negotiation and compromise. I've got my fingers crossed that the change in the US administration may affect that unwillingness to talk.
dreamer_easy: (feminist)
Rape Victims Suffer Ordeal to Get Medical Tests: "Victims of sexual assault in some areas of NSW are being forced to wait hours in blazing heat and travel up to 500 kilometres without showering because there are not enough local people to carry out the medical tests later used as evidence."

MPs seek to lift ban on abortion advice: "The federal coalition may accept a move to overturn a Howard government ban on Australian aid funding advice on abortion and other aspects of family planning."

In the Name of Hijab?: "Some so-called “traditional” Muslims argue that ‘Western’ women are oppressed because they must derive their self-worth from the gaze of men. However, it is also true that within some Islamic communities a woman who does not cover is not afforded the same respect as one who does. The expectations are different but the result is the same; a woman’s worth is still determined by others, including men."
dreamer_easy: (ave pomona)
The mysterious and sudden adoption of feminism by Islamophobes is endlessly amusing. Katha Pollitt comments: "In the zillions of words for which [David] Horowitz is responsible--as writer, activist, speechifier and editor of Frontpagemag.com--there is virtually no evidence of concern for the rights, liberties, opportunities or well-being of any women on earth, except for Muslims." She also points out how useful this is in attacking Western feminists "as a bunch of princessy complainers. (Domestic violence? job discrimination? abortion restrictions? Honey, you're lucky someone's not stuffing you into a burqa!)"

Damsels in distress?: "The west should stop using the liberalisation of Muslim women to justify its strategy of dominance."

"Muslim!" Now Available In Insult Form: "Long before America cared about the rights of women in the Muslim world, Muslim women were launching anti-honor killing jihads. One of the most far reaching attacks against Islamically sanctioned forced marriages has been a film from Pakistan, not a vitriolic screed written in a high-end magazine in London. Whenever there is progress in the Muslim world, it is because of something Muslims themselves accomplish."

Saudi Arabia, Aqsa Parvez, hijab )
dreamer_easy: (ave pomona)
I've started listening to a whole bunch of podcasts. Amongst all the brain-opening Zen talks I snagged was a short show about Muslim women - just an interview between a couple of British bloggers, basically. I was struck, as I'm sure any non-Muslim would've been, by the way their conversation was punctuated by Arabic words such as mashallah ("God has willed it!"), alhamdulillah ("Praise God!") and barikallah ("Thank God!"). These are of course just a more pious way of saying "thank goodness", "w00t" etc. But if you run your eye down various bits of good news at Muslimah Media Watch, you'll see that there are times when "thank goodness" just isn't enough! :-)

"More Muslim girls and women who wear hejab are getting involved in sports, mashallah!"

"All translations and site features were done by a Muslim woman, barikallah!"

"It’s looking like a good week for us, alhamdulillah!"

"King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has released the Qatif girl from her sentence! Allahu akbar!"
dreamer_easy: (ave pomona)
First some great news from the AP: Saudi king pardons rape victim: Abdullah reportedly spares woman in sex-assault case from jail and lashes. (But what about the man, who was also raped, and whose sentence was also increased? The article doesn't tell us.)

Still a long way to go for Saudi Arabia, with alleged rape victims denied forensic exams and the flogging and imprisonment of gays.

Mum saved me a charming clipping from local paper The Hills Shire Times, about a Christmas carols night hosted by a Muslim centre, an event organised by the Hills Interfaith Dialogue Group. Participants traded info on Advent and on the importance of Jesus and Mary in the Koran.



Right, well admittedly the timing on this is a bit weird, but here we are: Huge rise in Scots with racist prejudices (and they were surveyed before the nightmare at Glasgow Aiport). Scottish Muslim Osama Saeed comments at his blog, and was also interviewed by The Scotsman: "There is this idea in many people's minds that Muslims in this country sympathise with regimes like Saudi Arabia or Libya, when in fact many people are here because they fled those regimes and are here because of the freedoms we enjoy."

Via [livejournal.com profile] drhoz: Comic Book Characters Grouped by Religious Affiliation. Pineapple Man!

__
As I'm not firing on all cylinders, I'm going to take a break this week from blogging on these issues (unless there's some major news or I think of some fascinating point to make).
dreamer_easy: (ave pomona)
Excuse me while I fail to be at all surprised by this: Canadian Muslim girl not killed over hijab: report

I suppose the motive for the murder won't be clear until the trial - by which time the media are likely to have lost interest.
dreamer_easy: (feminist)
Christmas means rape and indecent assault for too many NSW women. "It's happening in factories, offices, law firms, in banks and in high-profile companies we all know. It's not just occurring at parties. Many employees get asked to stay back late this time of year to do overtime. Opportunistic bosses in particular are exploiting this situation."

Violence Against Women and the Role of Religion: this online essay explores how the scriptures of Islam, Judaism, and Christianity have been used to excuse domestic violence, and how they can also be used to oppose it.

From Arab News, a Saudi Muslim woman explains in detail that the Qatif sentence is not supported by the Koran: On the Flogging of a Female Rape Victim: "There is no legal or Islamic basis for such sentencing. Although it is true that according to Qur'anic teaching, a woman may not meet a man in privacy, no punishment was decreed for taking such action."

ETA: Just found a link I'd squirreled away, which compares the views of fundamentalists and religious liberals. "Fundamentalists themselves would claim that the Bible is the center of their worldview, but scriptural support for their more controversial positions is often scant and open to alternate interpretations. Ault notes that members of the pseudonymous Shawmut River Baptist Church 'generally held such views before they were "saved" and became born-again Christians. Their pro-family conservatism could not be explained, then, by doctrines or practices found in any particular religion.'"
dreamer_easy: (darkgod)
The father of a sixteen year old Canadian girl, Aqsa Parvez, has been charged with killing her. While police won't comment on a motive, Aqsa's friends have told the media that she clashed with her family over her decision not to wear the hijab or headscarf.

Now you may think this is confusing for a feminist who also opposes Islamophobia, but it isn't. From a feminist perspective, both the West and the Islamic world are guilty of enormous violence against women. You don't need to be told about the floggings, the honour killings, the executions for adultery and prostitution: the horrors women endure in the Islamic world are obvious and public. In the West, those horrors are more private. In Australia, as in much of the West, sexual violence is extremely common and only technically illegal. Bad men continue to beat, terrorise, and kill their wives and their children.

From this perspective, the mutual claim of Muslims and Westerners that the other guys are the ones who disrespect women are a bleak joke - especially given that young immigrant women can be caught between pressure from their families to cover their bodies and hair, and pressure from their peers and from the media to expose their bodies and hair.

As feminists, we don't have to choose sides between Islam and the West: we're free to fight violence against women no matter the source. Sure, I'd rather live in a wealthy Western democracy than an underdeveloped Islamic theocracy - but I hold no illusions that I'm living in a safe, equal paradise.
dreamer_easy: (currentaffairs)
2005 report from the Pew Global Attitudes Project: Islamic Extremism: Common Concern for Muslim and Western Publics: "Nearly three-quarters of Moroccans and roughly half of those in Pakistan, Turkey and Indonesia see Islamic extremism as a threat to their countries. At the same time, most Muslim publics are expressing less support for terrorism than in the past. Confidence in Osama bin Laden has declined markedly in some countries and fewer believe suicide bombings that target civilians are justified in the defense of Islam."

This 2006 news item from the Beeb made me laugh, in a bleak sort of way: Survey highlights Islam-West rift: "Many Westerners see Muslims as fanatical, violent and intolerant... Muslims, for their part, tend to view the West as selfish, immoral, and greedy - as well as fanatical and violent - the survey says." From the survey itself: "Western publics, by lopsided margins, do not think of Muslims as "respectful of women." But half or more in four of the five Muslim publics surveyed say the same thing about people in the West."

Interestingly, a majority of Muslims said they believed democracy can work in Muslim countries, while Westerners were more sceptical about it. Oh, and: "Muslims differ over whether there is a struggle in their country between Islamic fundamentalists and groups wanting to modernize society. But solid majorities of those who perceive such a struggle side with the modernizers."

It really does seem as though the average Muslim has a lot more in common with the average Westerner than a lot of us might think, and that there's a struggle going on in Islamic societies between hardline religion and a more open society, and between supporting violence and looking for other ways to resolve conflicts - rather like there is in the West.
dreamer_easy: (currentaffairs)
I get very impatient with the constant call for moderate Muslims to decry the words and works of extremist Muslims, when moderate Muslims do that all the time: it's just not as headline-grabbing. And if you didn't happen to hear about it from the news sources you follow, it may as well not have happened. (The same rubbish is said about feminists, often without even the effort of a thirty-second Web search.) The aim is to tar with the same brush over a billion human beings, from different countries, speaking different languages, from different races, with different politics (even within Saudi Arabia), following different beliefs and practices... but they're really all the same, you see.

Some more recent Saudi commentary on the Qatif case:

From Arab News: How 'Culture' Is Defended in a Globalized World: "Time after time judgments such as that passed in the “Qatif” case mortify us as Saudi nationals by their appalling and overt misogyny that inevitably makes headlines in the international press. It is an urgent issue because these authorities keep catching us by surprise and exposing us to international ridicule and condemnation with their own narrow religious-political agenda."

The Real Issue Raised by the Qatif Verdict: "The morality of the Qatif girl is not (and should not) be the main discussion point. The real issue at hand is that of a due process within our judicial system."

British Muslims on the Sudan teddy bear case:

A bear called Muhammad is no blasphemy; Blasphemy caused by cuddly animals; There's far more to Islam than a teddy
dreamer_easy: (facepalm)
Dammit, Martin Amis, I only just discovered your writing! Couldn't you have waited a bit longer before disgracing yourself by bashing Muslims?
dreamer_easy: (Default)
Got the Christian Democratic Party flier - that's Fred Nile's bunch. "KEEP OUR HERITAGE". Their policies: "zero tolerance" of drugs, no gay marriage, a 10 year moratorium on Islamic immigration. I question the legality of the latter. The party also "believes that environmental issues are important", whatever that may mean. Same old same old.

ETA: I posted more about this over at [livejournal.com profile] seeingred.
dreamer_easy: (australia)
Pell out of touch on climate - bishop "The head of the Anglican Church's international body on the environment, George Browning, said [Catholic Archbishop] Dr Pell's position on global warming defied scientific consensus and theological imperatives to protect the Earth and its future generations."
dreamer_easy: (australia)
Pauline Hanson wants Muslim immigration stopped, and claims she's had calls from many Australians who are "very frightened their culture and way of life is being taken away from them".

My first impulse is an exasperated laugh. But my second one is to wonder if people really are frightened, and if so, why they feel they are losing their way of life, even though that fear isn't realistic: the English language and the Easter hols are quite intact. (In the US I've encountered people very upset about information being provided in Spanish as well as English.)

In not entirely unrelated news, Baxter Detention centre is closing.
dreamer_easy: (Default)
Catching up on podcasts. Tom Keneally is making me LOL in a "Spirit of Things" called "Grumpy Old Religion" - there's a transcript online, although his scratchy old voice is a great part of the humour:

"One of the things I like about Judaism is that God is someone you argue with, as in the Old Testament, you know, God is right there for Moses to argue with and for Abraham to argue with. And God, I notice, is treated by some Holocaust survivors I know as a sort of over-imaginative, brilliant nephew who has written the world like a turbulent screenplay, and who has to be reasoned with so much. An old Jewish bloke said to me 'When I went to Malthausen and there was that quarry cliff and the SS throwing people over it, I said, "God, this has gone far enough".'."

(Kenneally's mention of Jesus' association with outcasts moved me. I'm not sure why; it's not as though it was an unfamiliar concept. Anyway, I've been banging around in Mark this evening. What anarchy!)
dreamer_easy: (australia)
I wonder what the heck Sheik Omran actually said? Did he really blame the drought on the infidel? I've heard both Christians and Pagans put the case that "out of control secular scientific values" are at least partly responsible for the environmental crisis, and that a more spiritual attitude to the Earth would help save us. But it's impossible to tell from the brief quotes the media are copying off each other what Omran's actual speech said.

Profile

dreamer_easy: (Default)
dreamer_easy

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 01:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios